![]() |
||
Cape
Fear Citizens For A Safe Environment |
||
| In The News | ||||||
| WWAY3 | ||||||
Feb 9, 2008 |
||||||
| LOCAL WHGR | ||||||
Feb 7, 2008 |
||||||
| WWAY3 | ||||||
Feb 7, 2008 |
||||||
| C&D landfill proposal draws Hugo Neu-like ire | ||||||
February 6, 2008 - The State Port Pilot, Southport, NC, Wednesday |
||||||
Site would eventually transition into recreation field or golf course when capacity is reached By Jonathan Spiers A landfill proposed in northern Brunswick County smacks of another Hugo Neu scenario to local environmentalists, but its developers insist that the project is not another dump. With just hours notice, members of Cape Fear Citizens for a Safe Environment (CFCSE) swarmed the small, somewhat isolated Perkinsville Baptist Church in the proportionately small city of Northwest Monday night, sitting in on a neighborhood meeting to inform residents of the project — a construction-and-demolition (C&D) landfill on more than 300 acres just north of the city’s borders. The meeting quickly grew contentious as CFCSE members shouted questions at the developer, Wrightsville Beach-based LDG Properties, which requested two weeks ago to voluntary annexation of the site off Mount Misery Road by Northwest — an approach reminiscent of international metals company Hugo Neu, which pitched what eventually evolved into an auto parts recycling landfill proposal nearly next door for about 700 acres that was annexed into the town of Navassa. “We’ve been previously lied to,” one woman yelled, “and this is two miles from the previous landfill site.” CFCSE relentlessly opposed the Hugo Neu project through its “Stop the Dump” campaign, garnering grassroots support and help from state legislators to prevent the project from progressing. During a statewide moratorium on new landfill projects that ended last year, Sims Group, which had since acquired Hugo Neu, announced it would not proceed with the project, though the company still owns the Navassa site. LDG principals Dean Byrd and David Edmonds told attendees, who included more than 50 residents of Northwest and three members of city council, that their landfill would not be a repeat of Hugo Neu, distinguishing C&D debris as less hazardous to the environment. “When a lot of people hear ‘landfill,’ they think of a dump,” Edmonds said. “This would not be a dump.” “We met with city council, and they asked us to have this meeting,” Byrd said. “We are not hiding from you; we came out here to see you. What I have asked you to do is look at this without writing it off as a landfill.” Edmonds highlighted the project’s benefits to the city, such as increased revenue for public services from per-ton tipping fees, as well as the site’s eventual transition into a recreation field or golf course when capacity is reached. Residents balked at the prospect of 40 to 50 trucks per day, six days a week, accessing the secluded site via neighborhood roads. Byrd replied that they would seek a truck-access route around the city but did not guarantee that such a road could be built. Others asked why the developer is proposing a landfill instead of more affordable housing, to which Byrd said LDG had initially sought to develop the site as a 500-home subdivision but found that unfeasible due to location and infrastructure restrictions. “To put affordable housing on this site, it was not affordable,” he said. Because he had already approached the city for that project, Byrd said he had given his word to offer the landfill alternative to Northwest before approaching Brunswick County, the site’s current jurisdiction. City council is expected to consider the annexation petition for the project at its next regular meeting on Tuesday, February 26. “I hope the city council people here will see and understand what’s going on here tonight, and not put on blinders,” one attendee said. When the audience dispersed, Byrd expressed dismay with how the meeting went. “This is terrible; not good at all,” he said, adding that Brunswick County is in need of a landfill for C&D debris and that county staff is aware of the proposal. The county’s C&D landfill tract off U.S. 17 near Supply is fast approaching its permitted capacity. Taking up 45 acres of a 100-acre tract, the landfill is slated to close this year unless the county is granted a five-year permit extension by the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, which was represented at Monday’s meeting.
On nearly 317 acres, the landfill proposed for Northwest would be larger than the county’s and smaller than the Hugo Neu project. The mound in Northwest would not exceed 33 feet in height and would include required buffers to reduce visibility. This year, the county landfill began transferring C&D debris to other landfills beyond Brunswick. County officials are determining whether to continue transferring debris, as is already done with municipal solid waste, expand the landfill at Supply or create a new landfill elsewhere in the county. “We may potentially be able to keep the landfill open until 2011 or 2012,” said Stephanie Lewis, assistant director of operation services for the county. “If we don’t divert as much as we’d like, we may close within the next year or two and use transfer.” Lewis recalled a previous proposal for a C&D landfill that did not proceed because the de-veloper deemed it not profitable with the county’s required franchise agreement. If annexed into Northwest, the landfill proposed by LDG would include a 20-year franchise agreement with the city. Byrd said such agreements average payments of about $3 to $5 per ton. |
||||||
|
||||||
| News casts from WWAY News Channel 3 | ||||||
August 13, 2007 |
||||||
| News casts from WWAY News Channel 3 | ||||||
May 5, 2007 |
||||||
Our
View: |
||||||
| Published on Wednesday, November 01, 2006 | ||||||
File this in the “it could have been so much worse” folder: The Apex hazardous-waste storage plant that burned early this month had no fire-suppression equipment installed. None. Because it wasn’t required by the state. The EQ Industrial Services plan, in the event of a fire, was that employees would extinguish it. What if a fire broke out when nobody was there? The events that began on the night of Oct. 5, including the evacuation of nearly half of Apex’s residents, reveal the answer — a fire that burns out of control for nearly two days, spreading a toxic fog over the town and sending 44 people to emergency rooms, most with breathing problems. It may be a miracle that nobody died or suffered serious injury. Apex fire officials let the fire burn itself out. Given the weather conditions — including rain that washed away the greenish-yellow cloud generated by the fire — that was probably the best decision, certainly the safest for firefighters. The cause of the blaze may never be known, because most clues to its origin were destroyed. Nor is it likely anyone will know what chemicals were incinerated in the fire, because EQ’s records were housed within the building as well. EQ officials say their plant lacked firewalls and fire-suppression equipment because the state didn’t require them. “We are highly regulated,” spokesman Robert Doyle said. “I can’t stress enough: In the business we are in, we know we have to meet the state requirements to do business.” In this case, state requirements are ludicrously lax. Allowing a large cache of toxic chemicals to be protected by a plan that trusts fires will break out only during business hours would be a joke, if the potential consequences weren’t so deadly. Allowing such poorly protected facilities adjacent to residential neighborhoods compounds the danger. The federal Chemical Safety Board is investigating the Apex fire. Board chairman Carolyn W. Merritt appears, so far, the only official speaking up about the clear danger. “The fire in Apex raises a number of questions,” she said, “including whether better fire detection, protection, firewalls, and separation measures could improve the safety of hazardous waste facilities — especially those close to residential neighborhoods.” Apex caught a huge break with wind and weather. Extensive testing has found no trace so far of toxic waste residues. But a state government that depends on dumb luck to protect its residents from what happened in Apex is a blood-chilling embarrassment. Fix it, please. Quickly. Copyright 2006 - The Fayetteville (NC) Observer
|
||||||
| Study links landfills to minority communities | ||||||
| Oct 25, 2006 09:27 AM EDT | ||||||
RALEGIH -- There seems to be a link between landfills and minority communities. That's according to a study presented this week to a legislative committee in Raleigh. The committee formed after lawmakers passed a one-year moratorium on new landfills like the proposed Sims Hugo Neu facility in Brunswick County. The environmental justice committee is supposed to make sure the state is protecting citizens from landfills, specifically evaluating the impact of landfills on minority groups and the poor. A professor from UNC Chapel Hill told the committee that landfills are twice as likely to be located in communities where the minority population exceeds ten percent than in predominantly white communities. The study's author used census data to compile her results, looking at landfill trends in North Carolina over the last 25 years. The results lend credibility to the accusation of landfill opponents, that solid waste companies are targeting minority communities. It's a hot button issue around the town of Navassa where Sims Hugo Neu is trying to get permission to build a 360 foot high landfill for shredded auto parts. The town is largely African-American and has actually welcomed the landfill and recycling company as a way to generate jobs and revenue for their poor area. Outspoken opponents of landfills say this study confirms what they already suspected about solid waste companies. But waste industry insiders say the data only reflects past practices, and nowadays they would never support or accept placing landfills in low wealth or minority communities. The committee in Raleigh is still gathering information, and is expected to discuss the findings of this study at a future meeting. The panel is supposed to make recommendations by February on how to best protect residents where landfills are concerned.
|
||||||
| Committees to look at impact of N.C. landfills | ||||||
| Oct 20, 2006 11:30 AM EDT | ||||||
BRUNSWICK COUNTY -- A one-year moratorium on landfills is in place right now in North Carolina. State lawmakers wanted committees to look at the impact the projects have on the state. It turns out two committees will be studying the landfill issue. One committee will look at the environmental impacts, another committee study why waste management companies appear to be targeting poor, minority communities. Over the last few years Hugo Neu opponents have tried to get legislation passed to keep the company from building a landfill in Brunswick County. But some lawmakers blocked those bills, including House Representatives Thomas Wright and William Wainwright. Rep. Wainwright said, "If there's a problem you need to take that up with the Town of Navassa." So some landfill opponents were shocked and disappointed when they learned House Speaker Jim Black appointed Wright and Wainwright to serve on the Committee for Environmental Justice. The committee's job is to study why so many waste companies are trying to build landfills in North Carolina. Now landfill opponents are pleading with these state leaders to talk to the experts and see for themselves how some landfill companies target poor, minority communities like Navassa. Landfill opponent Veronica Carter said, "Hopefully both representative Wainwright and Representative Wright will reach out to them. Hopefully they'll reach out to their constituents, all of the constituents, not just the ones who may gain monetarily from this, and again, not be penny wise and pound foolish." Phone calls to Rep. Wainwright and Rep. Wright were not returned Wednesday. But we did talk with local Rep. Danny McComas. He's on a separate committee that will study the environmental aspects of the proposed landfills. McComas says there is no need for North Carolina to start importing waste here from all over the world and if it's up to him Sims Hugo Neu will not be setting up a landfill in Brunswick County. Rep. McComas said, "It is coming to my attention every day, even as we speak. I still get phone calls, I still get e-mails, I still get people talking to me about it, and I look over here, we don't need to have Mount Flushmore." After these studies are complete the two committees will make recommendations and possibly introduce new legislation to change the way the State regulates landfills in the future. |
||||||
| Delair looking to redirect City Council | ||||||
| Oct 12, 2006 09:35 AM EDT | ||||||
WILMINGTON -- An easy victory Tuesday night for Pat Delair in Wilmington's City Council election could mean big changes for where the City is headed. Delair's campaign focused on re-directing the largely pro-growth council. After Mayor Spence Broadhurst left office Pat Delair launched a campaign to fill the vacant council seat. Despite presenting the City with a petition council members decided to appoint J.C. Hearne to fill the void. After running on a platform challening everything from the convention
center, to the City's handling of the sewer problem, Delair won Tuesday
night by about 1,900 votes. Delair campaigned on shaking up the Council. Three issues near the top of her list are: stopping the convention center, keeping Hugo Neu away and not allowing two-way traffic on Front Street. Already she says two of those issues are nearly set in stone. Concerning the convention center Delair said, "That's not in my hands. Americans for Prosperity is floating a petition. I said I would support them." Delair said, "Front Street's a done deal. I didn't support it when they brought up opening it up to two-way traffic. They're going to have to find funding." Delair also says the City can't control what Navassa does. "I don't think that we'll be able to stop that, but I think that perhaps we can put a resolution forth to not allow them to bring the recycled material through our neighborhoods." At City Hall she's getting a mixed reaction. The Council supported her opponent J.C. Hearne, appointing him to a vacant seat. Mayor Bill Saffo even appeared in a Hearne campaign ad. Still, Delair says, she's sticking by her goal of changing Wilmington's direction. "I'm not going to agree with them on everything, we're not all going to get along like they've been doing," Delair said. "That's not what I'm there to do." Delair is the first to admit that she's not sure how many of those goals will work out. Her term lasts only a year. In fact, Wednesday she said she's saving
her campaign signs to run again next year. |
||||||
| Gov. Easley comes to Wilmington to sign landfill moratorium | ||||||
| Sep 6, 2006 09:38 AM EDT | ||||||
WILMINGTON -- Hugo Neu's
proposed landfill in Navassa has drawn a lot of criticism. Monday Gov. Mike Easley came to Wilmington to sign that bill into law. Over the year-long moratorium Gov. Easley hopes to study where and why landfills are going into certain areas and what can be done for communities like Navassa to bring more economic possibilities. Gov. Easley signed the bill into law Monday morning
at Cape Fear Community College. Over the next year leaders want to look at why landfills
are going into certain areas. "Right here in the middle of this region, this is growing by leaps and bounds, warp speed. And we're bringing a lot of tourism, a lot of economic development that way, doesn't seem as consistent with a landfill," Gov. Easley said. "However, if we're not going to allow the landfill, then I think we owe it to the town of Navassa to come up with an alternative. Because right now they don't have any options. We've got to create options." In a statement released earlier Sims Hugo Neu officials have said they'll use the next year to educate citizens about their proposed project and at this point have no intention of leaving the area. |
||||||
| Hugo Neu-donated fire department could cost taxpayers millions | ||||||
| July 20, 2006, 04:27 PM EDT | ||||||
NAVASSA -- More details are emerging about a business deal between a small town in Brunswick County and a big company that wants to build a landfill there. The perks that Sims Hugo Neu Company has offered Navassa town leaders may not be as great as they initially seemed. Hugo Neu has talked a lot about the new fire department they're going to build for Navassa. We've learned this department could actually cost Navassa taxpayers millions of dollars in equipment and staffing expenses. The Sims Hugo Neu Company has taken their website offline. Before the site was taken down it showed on a page entitled "investing in the community," a picture of four firefighters in full turnout gear standing in front of a fire engine. The company is spending $100,000 to build Navassa a fire department, but the company is not paying to staff and equip the department. Leonard Jenkins opposes the landfill. He said, "We have a community that's been taken advantage of. Once we got the business plan, what actually is in that plan, what they say versus what they got. It's a big concern." Navassa has agreed to provide Hugo Neu with fire protection, a promise that could cost taxpayers millions of dollars to cover operating costs for the fire department. Fire engines alone cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Tack on insurance, equipment, utilities, communications gear and fuel and you're looking at a lot of cash. Landfill opponent Veronica Carter said, "It's absolutely incredible that a company can come down and take advantage of a poor, economically deprived minority community in this manner." Sims Hugo Neu spokesman Daniel Strechay said: "In addition to bringing about 40 entry-level industrial jobs with above average wages, full medical and dental benefits, life insurance and a retirement plan, we're providing Navassa $100,000 to build a new firehouse. How is that taking advantage of the Town? It's ludicrous to suggest we'd have to run the fire department as well to make this donation worthwhile." After waiting a week we finally got a call back from the mayor of Navassa late Wednesday night who says they don't have the specific details or numbers hammered out yet on where the fire department will go or how much it will cost. Instead of building a second fire department, they may merge their current facility with into the new building. The town council members have not returned repeated phone calls about this issue. ---- In our first version of this online story we
incorrectly stated that the mayor hadn't returned our calls; he returned
our calls shortly after this story went online. We regret not updating
the article sooner. |
||||||
| Details of Hugo Neu business plan come forward | ||||||
|
July 13, 2006, 06:17 PM EDT |
||||||
NAVASSA -- Opponents of Hugo Neu's proposed landfill project obtained a copy of the business plan and we have some of the details.
The contract spells out exactly what the town will get paid for letting Hugo Neu put a landfill in their backyard.
Landfill opponent Veronica Carter said, "To me, frankly, you asked me what my first thought was, I thought, economic racism. This isn't just environmental racism, where we're putting a landfill in a poor, predominantly African-American community, but we didn't even get a good deal for putting this environmental hazard into our community." Veronica Carter is one of the most outspoken opponents of the Hugo Neu landfill. She's researched what other North Carolina towns are getting paid to accept materials at their landfills. Bertie County gets $3.15 for every ton of trash it takes in. Camden County gets $2.10 a ton. When you multiply that times millions of tons it's a lot of money. But 50 cents a ton doesn't add up quite as quickly. Landfill opponent Leonard Jenkins said, "When I read the business plan, there is no doubt in my mind that they're being taken advantage of." Navassa Mayor Eulis Willis, who signed the business contract with Hugo Neu, is out of town on vacation. We called every single town council member to ask if they
think the town might be getting short changed. We couldn't get any of
them to comment. They say that they shouldn't have to pay as much to send
the shredded automobiles to Navassa because some of the material is going
to be recycled. One other disturbing discovery inside the contract is what is going into this landfill. Hugo Neu representatives have said all along it's going to be the remains of shredded automobiles. But we found out the business agreement also allows them to dump everything from demolition materials to industrial solid waste into the Navassa landfill. State lawmakers are moving toward a moratorium on all new landfills in North Carolina. A State Senate committee Wednesday unanimously approved an 18-month moratorium on the projects. That would give State officials time to study the impact solid waste disposal is having on the state. We're currently on track to be the fourth biggest
state in the country for landfills. |
||||||
| Lawmaker
blocks bill that would keep Hugo Neu out of Brunswick County |
||||||
|
June 28, 2006, 12:26 PM EDT |
||||||
Rep. Mickey Michaux He's the lawmaker who's single-handedly blocking a bill that would keep the Hugo Neu landfill out of Brunswick County. For weeks Representative Mickey Michaux has refused to return phone calls, letters and e-mails from concerned residents who live near the proposed landfill.
A handful of residents Tuesday caught Rep. Michaux in the halls of the State capita Despite the urgency of their problem and the fact that Mr. Michaux had a sit-down meeting with their opponents, Michaux gave Brunswick County residents less than two minutes of his time.
Richard Beatty lives next-door to the proposed landfill. Beatty said,
"It's really frustrating. You just want to be heard. I'm trying to
get heard and I can't get heard." Brunswick County Representative Bonner Stiller agrees. He sponsored a
bill to block the landfill and is furious that Durham County Rep. Mickey
Michaux is interfering. When asked what the biggest pros are of bringing this landfill to Navassa, Rep. Michaux said, "I don't know. I don't have the slightest idea. All I know is what is going on is precedent setting, and I don't think you want to set a precedent in the short session, when you can't devote full attention to it." The bill in question would give zoning control over the proposed landfill
site to Brunswick County commissioners who oppose the Hugo Neu facility.
Concerned Brunswick County resident Veronica Carter said, "All new laws are a precedent. They are precedent setting." Local lawmakers say they still have a few tricks up their sleeve to block the Hugo Neu landfill before this legislative session wraps in the next few weeks. Hugo Neu still doesn't have the necessary State permits to build their controversial facility. If they get them, groundbreaking is probably still a few years away. |
||||||
| Will they use their power for good? | ||||||
|
|
||||||
The N.C. General Assembly has the power to kill the proposed Sims Hugo Neu landfill in Brunswick County. Action in the coming week should tell whether the Honorables are willing to use it. The Senate is expected this week to pass Columbus Democrat R.C. Soles' bill giving the Brunswick commissioners zoning authority over the landfill site (which is technically in Navassa, even though it's a mile away from the rest of the town). But there's a also glimmer of hope that the House version may finally make its way out of the rules committee, where it has been languishing since Brunswick Republican Bonner Stiller and Columbus Democrat Dewey Hill filed it last month. It seems a rules co-chairman got the idea that Soles and Wilmington Rep. Thomas Wright of Wilmington opposed the House bill. Soles says he wants it passed; Wright, who's tight with slippery Speaker Jim Black, is not as forthcoming but promises that the bill "will get a hearing this year." Which doesn't speak to the question of how he'll vote should it get to the floor. Of course, the company's lobbyists will no doubt try to make a case for the economic and environmental benefits of a 350-foot Mount Fluffmore in northern Brunswick County. Which voice will have the most influence over the
Honorables - the well-financed lobbyists, or the Brunswick County residents
who have made it clear they don't want to live near a big pile of shredded
automobiles? |
||||||
| Panel sends Sims Hugo Neu landfill fate before Senate | ||||||
|
Mark Schreiner: (919) 835-1434 |
||||||
Next week, lawmakers will vote on the fate of the Sims Hugo Neu landfill project. On Thursday, a Senate committee gave quick approval to a bill that would effectively kill the project. The full Senate will vote on it next week. Meanwhile, it appeared Thursday that the state House might
debate an identical bill pending in one of its committees - or perhaps,
later, the twin Senate bill. Rep. Bonner Stiller, R-Brunswick, and Sen. R.C. Soles, D-Columbus, said Thursday's events showed that chances are increasing that a law will be passed this year that will halt the project. The Senate Commerce Committee, chaired by Soles, approved his bill Thursday morning with little discussion and no dissent. "This is about stopping one of those massive, mountainous dumps that are trying to come into the area," Soles told the committee. Senate leaders scheduled a vote on his proposal, Senate
Bill 1185, for Tuesday. House Bill 2093, sponsored by Stiller and Rep. Dewey Hill, D-Columbus, would do the same thing. Sims Hugo Neu, the global recycling giant, opposes the bills. Company executives are seeking state environmental permits to open a facility to store material left over from automobile recycling until the so-called "auto fluff" could be used to make other products. The company argues that the landfill and recycling operation would bring jobs and tax dollars to struggling community. It seemed Thursday that a political hurdle in the House
had been cleared. Rep. Mickey Michaux, D-Durham, responded that the bill's
progress was halted because of objections raised by Soles and Rep. Thomas
Wright, D-New Hanover. "Let me be clear about this: I want it passed,"
Soles said to Michaux, who is one of three co-chairmen of the influential
House rules committee. "That is not my district and I am not involved,"
Wright said. Wright was referring to a bill from last year's effort to kill the Hugo Neu project. That bill has never had a hearing. Stiller said he asked Michaux last week to move the new
Stiller-Hill bill forward. Wright said it was possible Michaux was speaking about the new bill but wrongly assumed he was talking about last year's dead proposal. "I am hoping Rep. Michaux will release the bill for a vote next week," said Veronica Carter, president of the opposition group Brunswick Citizens for a Safe Environment. Michaux could not be reached for comment Thursday. "The arguments against it for last year seem to be taken out." Stiller and Hill's bill "will get a hearing"
this year, Wright said. |
||||||
| Group Fighting Sims Hugo Neu Receives Pelican Award | ||||||
|
Brunswick Citizens for a
Safe Environment (BCFSE) acknowledged by the June 6, 2006, Wilmington, NC |
||||||
The North Carolina Coastal Federation (NCCF) presented this year’s Citizen Action Award to the Brunswick Citizens for A Safe Environment (BCFSE) for their efforts to prevent the Sims Hugo Neu landfill in Brunswick County. NCCF is the state’s only non-profit agency working full-time to protect and restore the state’s coastal creeks, rivers, sounds and beaches. The Pelican Award for Citizen’s Action recognizes the effective work of citizens, government officials, legislators, journalists, non-profit organizations, educators and researchers to improve environmental quality on the North Carolina coast. “Members of BCFSE simply did not accept that landfilling three million cubic yards of automobile shredder residue was a safe “recycling” project,” Todd Miller, Executive Director of NCCF said. “Many dedicated individuals have put many hours into the fight and BCFSE has held off Hugo Neu for two years with a combination of political, technical and legal activities." Miller stated. Veronica Carter and Leonard Jenkins, president and vice
president of BCFSE, accepted the award June 1 during the annual State
Of The Coast event. To learn more and to sign the petition to stop Hugo
Neu, go the stopthedump.com |
||||||
| Senator:
Don't dump on N.C. Some urge a halt to landfill permits |
||||||
Published: May 20, 2006 12:30 AM By Wade Rawlins, Staff Writer |
||||||
![]() |
|
|||||
| Sims
project battle flares House bill, foes target plan as firm strategizes |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Raleigh | New fronts opened, and an old one reopened, Thursday in the fight over the Sims Hugo Neu recycling project.
|
||||||
| Soles starts new effort to block Hugo Neu | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| RALEIGH | The Sims Hugo Neu project
is again on the N.C. General Assembly's agenda.State Sen. R.C. Soles, thwarted
in his efforts to kill the project last year, filed a bill Tuesday that
starts the process over again."The powers that be have got it stopped,"
the Democrat from Columbus County said of last year's bill. "I'm going
to pass it again and send it over" to the House.The company wants to
build a landfill and recycling center on 750 acres it owns in Navassa in
northern Brunswick County. It has applied to the N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources for permits and the review process, which can take
years, is underway.Company officials could not be reached for comment.Soles
and state Rep. Bonner Stiller, R-Brunswick, ignited a struggle over the
project in the legislature last year by introducing legislation that would
make the project impossible to build in Brunswick County.Their efforts met
resistance. The company hired four lobbyists to press its case with lawmakers.
They argued that the project would provide jobs and tax revenue in a depressed
corner of the county.The bill introduced by Soles would give the Brunswick
County commissioners planning and zoning power over that part of Navassa.
Since a majority of the commissioners say they oppose the landfill, the
bill would have the affect of handing power over the use of the land to
the project's opponents.Soles' bill took an unusual course through the legislature.
To get his last-minute proposal heard last summer, Soles deleted the words
from a health care bill sponsored by state Rep. Thomas Wright, D-New Hanover,
and inserted his own.That version passed the Senate and returned to the
state House. In the House, the bill was sidelined, with chamber leaders
saying that Soles' changes were too radical and thus violated House rules.With
a fresh bill, Soles hopes to avoid any parliamentary pitfalls."They
won't have those legitimate complaints about my brand new bill," he
said.Mark Schreiner: (919) 835-1434 mark.schreiner@starnewsonline.com |
||||||
|